Reference
K. Verbert, B. De Schutter, and R. Babuška, "Reasoning under uncertainty
for knowledge-based fault diagnosis: A comparative study,"
Proceedings of the 9th IFAC Symposium on Fault Detection,
Supervision and Safety of Technical Processes (SafeProcess 2015), Paris,
France, pp. 422-427, Sept. 2015.
Abstract
This paper addresses reasoning under uncertainty for knowledge-based fault
diagnosis. We illustrate how the fault diagnosis task is influenced by
uncertainty. Furthermore, we compare how the diagnosis task is solved in the
Bayesian and the Dempster-Shafer reasoning framework, in terms of both
diagnostic performance and additional objectives, like transparency,
adaptability, and computational efficiency. Since the diagnosis problem is
influenced by different kinds of uncertainty, it is not straightforward to
determine the optimal reasoning method. First, the different uncertain
influences all have their own characteristics, asking for different reasoning
approaches. So, to solve the whole problem in one reasoning framework,
approximations and trade-offs need to be made. Second, which types of
uncertainty are present and to what extent, is highly application-specific.
Therefore, the best framework can only be assigned after the problem, the
uncertainty characteristics, and the user requirements are known.
Publisher page
Downloads
BibTeX
@inproceedings{VerDeS:15-006,
author = {Verbert, Kim and De Schutter, Bart and Babu{\v{s}}ka, Robert},
title = {Reasoning Under Uncertainty for Knowledge-Based Fault
Diagnosis: {A} Comparative Study},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 9th IFAC Symposium on Fault Detection,
Supervision and Safety of Technical Processes (SafeProcess
2015)},
address = {Paris, France},
pages = {422--427},
month = sep,
year = {2015}
}